What’s up with you today? (Nothing, now that I’m reading Wodehouse)

‘What’s up with you today?’ he asked.

He could hardly have chosen a worse formula. The question has on most people precisely the same effect as that which the query, ‘Do you know where you lost it?’ has on one who is engaged in looking for mislaid property.

‘Nothing,’ said Reade. Probably at the same moment hundreds of other people were making the same reply, in the same tone of voice, to the same question.

The Pothunters (1902)

I started reading The Pothunters yesterday. It’s a habit of mine, every so often, to set about re-reading the complete works of P.G. Wodehouse in order of publication, starting with The Pothunters (1902), his first published novel. Invariably I get distracted from my purpose, somewhere between A Prefect’s Uncle and Love Among the Chickens. Sometimes, it’s the distractions of life. ‘Life!’ as Douglas Adams’ paranoid android Marvin says, ‘Don’t talk to me about life.’

More often it is Wodehouse who distracts me. I pick up The Mating Season or Pigs Have Wings, or possibly Mulliner Nights, in search of a reference and end up reading the whole thing. Life goes on, time passes, until one day I begin with The Pothunters all over again. Fortunately, it’s a dashed enjoyable book.

I picked it up yesterday in an odd sort of mood. Life has been a bit of strain lately and I’ve been identifying with the aforementioned Marvin more than ever.

‘The first ten million years were the worst,’ said Marvin, ‘and the second ten million years, they were the worst too. The third ten million years I didn’t enjoy at all. After that I went into a bit of a decline.’

Douglas Adams (The Restaurant at the End of the Universe)

So I turned to Wodehouse, as I often do, as a soothing balm in troubled times. The therapeutic power of great comic writing has long been undervalued by self-appointed literary elites, who look down their noses at light fiction, and sneer at those who read for pleasure. And even sensible reviewers and book bloggers often struggle when it comes to reviewing Wodehouse. I’ve lost count of the times I’ve seen Wodehouse novels ‘reviewed’ with a few sentences along the lines of ‘I enjoyed it, but as a light comic novel, there isn’t much more to say.’ Others stick like glue to Stephen Fry’s view that ‘you don’t analyse such sunlit perfection.’

Is it any wonder that I have these odd moods? There is plenty to be gained from analysing Wodehouse. Why does his writing make us happy? What is is about his world and characters that appeal to us? Are there lessons we can take from his writing to make the world a better place? What can emerging writers learn from Wodehouse so that his legacy can extend to future generations of writers and readers, who need sunshine in our souls?

It’s all part of the Plumtopian vision – to inhabit a world where the healing balm of Wodehouse is liberally applied.

She melted quite perceptibly. She did not cease to look like a basilisk, but she began to look like a basilisk who has had a good lunch.

The Girl on the Boat


39 thoughts on “What’s up with you today? (Nothing, now that I’m reading Wodehouse)

  1. I’ve never actually tried to read all of Wodehouse, though I believe I do have them all as e-books. The size of the task daunts me … 94 books! I’m not entirely certain how many of them I actually have read, either … especially with the Blandings and Jeeves series, they tend to blur together a bit over the years (and I’ve been reading PGW for over 40 years).

    I also see from your blog site that I have been elevated to the ranks of Plumtopians. I shall endeavour to be worthy of this signal honour. – JB

    (Yes, yes, I’m putting off writing. Ssh.)

    Liked by 1 person

    1. What Ho! What Ho! I think the Plumtopians featured in the sidebar may rotate so if you pop off at some point, don’t be offended? You are definitely in the list. I doubt I will ever complete the project of re-reading Wodehouse in order. Not unless I write a best seller myself, and manage to fund early retirement. What a curse it is for we readers/writers who rely on our day-jobs. I should be writing my own fiction now too — I won’t tell anyone if you don’t.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Well done! I have just legged it to the local cafe as I wasn’t getting any writing done at home. The other Glossops seem incapable of making the simplest move without consulting me. I must be disciplined and use the time now.

        Liked by 1 person

      2. I’ve moved into the other bedroom to hide from the sun. But in a counter-stroke against productivity I now have musics. I used to live in Glossop 🙂


  2. I think comedy can be one of the hardest styles to write in, and takes great skill. Wodehouse may be light and funny, but as you say, he also brings great comfort, so I don’t think light & funny always equals disposable and worthless – literary elites are missing the point! I hope the Wodehouse healing balm is working its wonders for you 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

      1. Perhaps I misunderstand the dialogues. It’s from his grandson George. Anyway I borrowed “The Little Nugget” and “Pigs have Wings” from the library for future read! 😀

        Liked by 1 person

      2. You may be right. I know very little about Freemasons so if there is a joke in there, I am likely to have missed it. I wonder if anyone else has spotted it?


  3. Undoubtedly his writing is like a soothing balm for frayed nerves. Other than perfect linguistic skills, I think he presents steel-like nuggets of wisdom of life in velvet-cushioned humour. Therein lies his greatness.

    Liked by 1 person

      1. Thank you so much for your lovely comments and for re-blogging!

        (You may like to know that the article I wrote about Plumtopia is the most popular post with my readers – head and shoulders above the rest!)

        Liked by 1 person

      2. Your stuff is all so readable and well considered. It won’t be long until you are firmly established in the blogging world. The trick then, is to keep the stuff coming. I find a good piece takes time — anything from a full day to several weeks. Very occasionally I decide to write something brief, just so people know I’m still alive, but when I sit down to write it, it develops into something more.

        I’m currently aiming to produce an average of one post week. The most prolific bloggers work more quickly, and produce content more often than this, but my blog is not linked to topical content or trying to generate sales, so think a weekly post is reasonable. Occasionally, when life intervenes, I post less frequently.

        Some of my favourite bloggers might not post for several months, but are always worth reading when they do.

        Whatever rhythm works for you, I am going to enjoy following you.

        Liked by 1 person

      3. Thank you *so much* for this encouragement!

        You are absolutely right in what you say about needing to keep posting I have several ideas on file and half-written pieces, but, as you say, a good piece takes time, and things are a little hectic here.

        A post a week sounds pretty impressive, given your other commitments. I have a weekly post at my business blog (a horticultural nursery) but I’ve held back the April ones because I noticed that the tone had descended into reportage and lost the energy and enthusiasm of the first few months, and I need to rewrite them.

        I feel that I’m starting to get to grips with my occasional/opinion pieces at Moulders Lane but I’m really struggling to find time to write posts for my Warrington blog. Again, I have several half-written pieces on file and no shortage of ideas but, as its factual, even the briefest pieces require a lot of research.

        I’m getting slightly more of a feel for what blogging’s all about though (and more and more respect for bloggers!) and I really admire your discipline in the way you approach it. It’s inspiring me to look at possible ways of re-organising my own day – and hopefully become as productive as you!


      4. (Incidentally, if you were looking for a step towards publishing: I read that post about Harriet Vane you gave a link for (http://www.the-toast.net) and it was *extremely* well written and well-argued. ‘The Toast’ seems to be some sort of online magazine which pays its contributors, so it might be something to look into. I didn’t look round much of the rest of the site as it was chock full of big adverts – presumably how they can afford to pay people – but if the other stuff is as good as the Harriet Vane article then it might be something you’d be happy to be associated with.)

        Liked by 1 person

      5. Nice, strategic thinking. I’m afraid I’d associate with anyone when it comes to be published. Although I at least have the decency to be ashamed of this fact. I will have a closer look at the Toast.

        Liked by 1 person

      6. Publishing is a long way off. Need to actually finish something. I will definitely finish and post the Wodehouse short story to the blog though.


      7. My question was mostly an attempt to lay claim to the pun. 🙂 (please delete other version of this, which accidentally included my full name)


  4. I’ve just discovered that a lot of Wodehouse’s early work Is available at Project Gutenberg (http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/search?query=P+gWodehouse). It’s interesting to see how his style develops – I knew he’d reworked ‘Love Among the Chickens’ from the original 1906 version which he considered bad work later on, but there’s also a not very good one called ‘Betty and the Prince’ (1912) from which he’s lifted the central portion and reworked it into ‘Psmith, Journalist’ (1915).

    ‘BatP’ bears the hallmarks of having been written originally as an American magazine serial and it’s interesting to see that even Wodehouse struggled a little with finding the right tone in the early stages of his career.

    I’d recommend referring to the historical money converter Measuring Worth (http://measuringworth.com) when reading them; it adds a lot to your sense of the period.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I think you (or perhaps someone else) directed me to currency conversion site previously. Fascinating, especially when you realise his school boys were throwing around comparatively substantial amounts.
      The early works have been online for some years, which was wonderful back on the days before the Everyman reprintings, as some were notoriously hard to find. Although I generally prefer to read them in book form, I love being able to use the search function when there is something particular I am looking for, and can’t find.
      I moved to an ipad earlier in the year, which makes writing on the bus easier, but other things I used to do (like use WordPress) lamentably more difficult. I have not discovered how to find text in ebooks on the ipad.
      Anyway, must dash like mad now as I am really late.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Given the choice, I’d far rather have a book; but it’s great to be able to read stories online you’ve not been able to find in the shops, or have no money for.

        I use free online books the same way I used to use the library – to discover authors whose books you definitely want to buy, or whose books you’d like to read but wouldn’t necessarily buy to keep.

        I was given an iPad for my birthday last year and am now a complete Apple convert. Not only is it a dream to use but it’s incredibly beautiful as an object.

        I have so many problems with my clunky laptop – I’m putting in for a MacBook this year (if only!).

        Liked by 1 person

      2. I like the ipad in many ways. I think my issues are partly because the ipad versions /Apps for sites I use are not as functional as the ‘normal’ web page. WordPress is a good example. Viewing and commenting are more cumbersome, so I find I put these things off until the weekend, when I can sit at a desktop.

        Writing on the ipad is also more difficult in some ways, but that suits me, because I concentrate on what I am writing, without the distractions of formatting etc. Those things are all sorted on the weekend when I collate the work I’ve done during the week’s commuting. So it is actually a really good tool to ensure I focus on creating a first draft. I am getting there — about half way finished with the Wodehouse story, and excited about sharing it with you.

        The portability of the ipad makes it indispensable for the aspiring writer with a day-job and a longish commute.

        Liked by 1 person

      3. I’m getting more and more of an impression of you as an admirably disciplined person!

        As a touch-typist, I find it very difficult to use the iPad for anything lengthy and much prefer using a right angled screen and keys for ‘proper work’, which is why I stick with this old laptop despite its manifest problems.

        Portability in travelling situations is a huge plus though – I think the IPad will become as indispensable as the mobile phone soon, with laptops relegated to the home or hotel room for the worker/writer and pcs only used in larger offices.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s